I want to search for...
Permit #2006060401
Permit Details
Status: CANCEL
| Parcel Id: 08-12-31-0650-000B0-0120 |
| Total Square Footage: 11076 sqft |
| Block: 000B0 |
| Subdivision: 2096 - TUSCAN RESERVE |
| Job Phone: (407)478-4500 |
| Location Address: 402 TUSCAN RESERVE DR |
| Type: BCR - BUILDING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL -CONDO |
| NOC: Unknown |
| Applicant name: ROGER B KENNEDY |
| Owner: TUSCAN RESERVE LLC |
|
Address PO BOX 1509 SANFORD, FL 32772 |
| Lot: 0120 |
| Contracted Stated Job Value: ¤879,988.00 |
| Job Description: 8 UNIT CONDOMINIUM - BUILDING 400 |
| Type: CN |
Contractor
KENCON CORPORATION
| Status | Location Address | Mailing Address | State License Number | Phone | Fax |
| CANCEL |
KENCON CORPORATION ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32714 |
217 N. WESTMORE DRIVE # 3021 ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FL 32714 |
CGC005368 (Exp: 09/30/2008) | (407)478-4500 | (407)478-4501 |
Inspection History
| Type | Request Date | Result | Inspector |
| FOUNDATION SURVEY APPROVED BY STORMWATER | |||
| FIRST ROUGH PLUMBING INSPECTION | |||
| MONOLITHIC SLAB INSPECTION/SLAB | |||
| LATH /BRICK FLASHING | |||
| LINTEL | |||
| ALL ROUGH | |||
| ROOF SHEATHING/BRACES/TIES/ DOWN CELL | |||
| INSULATION INSPECTION | |||
| FIREWALL INSPECTION | |||
| ENGINEERING FINAL | |||
| UTILITY COMMERCIAL FINAL | |||
| UTILITY COMPANY FINAL | |||
| LANDSCAPE FINAL | |||
| FIRE FINAL | |||
| FINAL COMPLETE BUILDING INSPECTION |
Review History
| Department | Status | Date In | Date Out |
| BLD | COMPLETE | 03/16/2007 | 03/16/2007 |
| Note: Released By: CCOTE Approved for Release. REVISION: 2006 Building Code Supplement Review. | |||
| BLD | COMPLETE | 08/16/2006 | 08/16/2006 |
| Note: Released By: CCOTE Approved for Release. Revision: Slab reinforcing change, post tension shop drawings submitted. | |||
| BLD | COMPLETE | 07/31/2006 | 08/02/2006 |
| Note: approved per Carl Cote Building 7 (700): 11,076 sf – 8 unit condo building. The value on application is a little low. This is a Type VB construction so 11076 x 79.45 = $879,988.20. value provided: 678,270 | |||
| BLD | HOLD | 07/11/2006 | 07/12/2006 |
| Note: Held By: CCOTE CITY OF PALM COAST BUILDING DIVISION Comments on Permit Application (Tuscan Reserve Buildings 1-9) The following items must be submitted/clarified in order to complete the Building Permit Application plan review. Previous items that were addressed and completed that need no further action have been removed. New comments made to previous items are shown as Bold Italic. 3. Sheet S1.2 and S1.3 provide generic connector schedules. Details 3&4/S6.3 indicate to use an H5 connector. Details mentioned above as well as 5,6,8/S6.3 give an option to use either 1 or 2 connectors based on the uplift. The specific connector and the number of connectors to be used are not allowed to be selected in the field by the contractor. Either specify specific connector and quantity for each truss on the drawings or add note stating that connectors to be installed per signed and sealed truss connector shop drawing schedule. What occurs when the uplift exceeds 1,200? Possibly the girder trusses? 5. Sheet S1.3 has a generic truss to wood connector schedule however the details indicate some of the connectors to be used. The note #1 of this schedule indicates to provide truss anchor that provides an uplift capacity equal to or greater than the uplift indicated on the truss shop drawings. This is not acceptable, note shall be removed or modified. The drawings need to identify the specific connector(s) to use for each truss or a signed and sealed truss connector shop drawing can be included during construction as a part of the truss shop drawing package. This note was modified however it still lets the contractor select the connectors to use out in the field. This is not acceptable. Refer to note 5 comments as to what is acceptable. 14. Detail 8/S6.2 identifies a precast lintel, see schedule. Based on the on Sheet S1.2 the first floor level would require an 8" high lintel and the second floor level would require a 24" high lintel. This is not consistent with what is shown on the elevations as well as the architectural detail 8/A7.1. Revise detail(s) and drawing(s) as necessary to provide consistent information. The details were revised however sheet S1.2 removed lintels for lengths over 12'-0". Sheet A3.1 dimensions the clear opening width as 12'-8". Please clarify what lintel is to be used here. 17. Provide information identifying how railing & balusters will be constructed and installed to meet structural loading. In addition identify if any posts are required, if so provide size spacing and attachment detail(s) to comply with Florida Building Code Section 1015. Response to this item refers you to sheet A8.4 however this is not a revised sheet. The only details on this sheet are door installation details. Provide requested information. ------------------------------------------------- Carl L. Cote, R.A. Senior Plans Examiner City of Palm Coast - Building Department 2 Commerce Boulevard Palm Coast, Florida 32164-3216 [tel]: (386) 986-4753 [fax]: (386) 986-3781 [email]: ccote@ci.palm-coast.fl.us ------------------------------------------------- | |||
| BLD | HOLD | 06/21/2006 | 06/22/2006 |
| Note: Held By: CCOTE Held By: CCOTE CITY OF PALM COAST BUILDING DIVISION Comments on Permit Application No. 2006060401 (Tuscan Reserve Building - 1000) The following items must be submitted in order to complete the Building Permit Application plan review. 1. The drawing sets contain drawings for all building types. To help us expedite our review and to make it less cumbersome for our inspectors to check the drawings out in the field we are requesting that the drawing sets be made building specific. For example building 100 shall have all drawings removed that do not apply to this building and shall have details on sheets to remain that do not apply to be removed, (manually crossing out is acceptable). In addition, it is not clear what building applies to each permit since the permit applications reference 100, 200, 300, … and the site plan on A1.0 indicates 1, 2,3, … Also, none of the garages are numbered and no permits have been applied for these buildings yet. It is also highly recommended that each garage building be permitted separately. 2. Sheet S3.1, Note 4: This note conflicts with size of opening indicated on sheet A2.1 General Note #1. Revise either drawing note so that size is consistent. 3. Sheet S1.2 and S1.3 provide generic connector schedules. Details 3&4/S6.3 indicate to use an H5 connector. 4. Sheet S1.2 has a generic truss to masonry connector schedule however the details show that the trusses will be bearing on wood plates that are on top of the masonry wall. Clarify where these connectors will be used and if not to be used then remove. The note #2 of this schedule indicates to provide truss anchor that provides an uplift capacity equal to or greater than the uplift indicated on the truss shop drawings. This is not acceptable, note shall be removed or modified. The drawings need to identify the specific connector(s) to use for each truss or a signed and sealed truss connector shop drawing can be included during construction as a part of the truss shop drawing package. 5. Sheet S1.3 has a generic truss to wood connector schedule however the details indicate some of the connectors to be used. The note #1 of this schedule indicates to provide truss anchor that provides an uplift capacity equal to or greater than the uplift indicated on the truss shop drawings. This is not acceptable, note shall be removed or modified. The drawings need to identify the specific connector(s) to use for each truss or a signed and sealed truss connector shop drawing can be included during construction as a part of the truss shop drawing package. 6. Detail 8/S6.3 has a note to refer to Sheet S1.01 for shear wall location. This sheet could not be found. Either revise note or provide missing sheet. 7. Sheet A2.1, General Note #3 refers to a shearwall schedule. This schedule could not be found and it appears that none apply to this plan. Either remove note or provide schedule. 8. Sheet A2.1, General Note #9 references an outdated code and incorrect section. Update code year and section reference. 9. Detail 2/A2.1 has wall hatching at the tenant separation walls per the Wall Legend. They appear to be hatched for a standard masonry wall was well as hatched for 1-hour rated studs. Hatch wall to indicate a 1-hour rated masonry wall. 10. Detail 6&7/A7.2 have a note that references UL# L5211. Update note to reference correct UL#. 11. Sheet A7.2, Note 03300L references a concrete beam. This note is not referenced on all details that have a concrete beam. The details that have this beam appear to show the beam as 2 courses high and at locations that are not aligned with the bolt locations. The note also refers you to the structural drawings where it is shown on Details 1&3/A6.2 which appears to show the beam as 3 courses high however, the note only indicates the beam as 1 course. Clarify notes and details to be clear and consistent. 12. Sheet A4.1 Note 6; Sheets A6.1, A6.2, A6.3 Note 16; Sheet A11.3, A7.2 Note 11; Sheet A11.1 Note 9; Sheet A11.2 Note 8 all reference an outdated code and incorrect section. Update code year and section reference. 13. Detail 8/S6.2 does not match Detail 8/A7.1. Revise either detail to provide consistent information. 14. Detail 8/S6.2 identifies a precast lintel, see schedule. Based on the on Sheet S1.2 the first floor level would require an 8" high lintel and the second floor level would require a 24" high lintel. This is not consistent with what is shown on the elevations as well as the architectural detail 8/A7.1. Revise detail(s) and drawing(s) as necessary to provide consistent information. 15. Drawing General Notes, many sheets. There is a note that states "Provide double pane glass at all exterior windows". The energy calculations indicate (single default). Revise notes or update energy calculations to provide consistent information. 16. Detail 5/A8.1 has note 06100.K for a header, see structural. Sheet S3.4 indicates an H3 over the garage doors however no description of this could be found. Provide header information. 17. Provide information identifying how railing & balusters will be constructed and installed to meet structural loading. In addition identify if any posts are required, if so provide size spacing and attachment detail(s) to comply with Florida Building Code Section 1015. 18. Detail 10/A7.3. Modify note to state that access panel is a fire-rated access panel and that the rating shall match the ceiling assembly it is installed in. 19. Sheet P2.1 has a detail tag reference for a 1/P6.2 however Sheet P6.2 does not have any numbered details. 20. Sheet H3.1, Note 10 shall be modified to include a label that shall be placed adjacent to where the exhaust enters the wall. The label shall bear the words: "This dryer shall meet or exceed the exhausting thru a developed length of *** per the dryer manufacturer's installation instructions." *** shall be the actual developed length installed. 21. Sheet E3.1 and E3.2, Receptacles on living room side of wall between kitchen and living room, and that are within 6-feet of the kitchen sink must be GFCI protected. 22. Sheet E3.1 and E3.2, Show attic access location, attic light, as well as how attic lighting will be switched. 23. Sheet E3.2, Provide receptacle in bedroom hallway adjacent to panel C. 24. The building elevations show outdoor building lighting which is not indicated on the house panel or indicated anywhere on the electrical drawings. 25. The first floor entry porches indicate a junction box for future lighting and the entry porches for the 2nd floor units do not indicate any lighting. Lighting must be provided at time of construction at areas of exit discharge to meet the requirements of Building Code Section 1006.1.3. 26. Sheet E5.1. The light fixture types are not indicated for any of the lighting fixtures. 27. Sheet E6.1, The house panel does not indicate exterior building lighting. It also indicates a photo cell for the porch lighting and the plans indicate this light to be switched; verify whether this is on the house panel or tenant panel and whether it is on a photo cell. 28. Sheet E6.1, Meter Center #2 indicates type 'B' on diagram and the load summary indicates type 'C' units. Modify diagram or summary to be consistent. 29. Sheet E6.2, Grounding Detail. This detail indicates the ground rods to be a minimum of 6" separation. The NEC requires a minimum 6-foot separation per 250.56. 30. Energy Code Packets. The floor areas indicated do not match those on the drawings. Provide separate packets for each floor level due to floor area differences as well as ceiling type differences. In addition, provide 1st and 2nd floor packets for the middle 'B' units due to exterior wall differences as well as glazing differences. In addition, all packets must be signed at the Owner/Agent section. ------------------------------------------------- Carl L. Cote, R.A. Senior Plans Examiner City of Palm Coast - Building Department 2 Commerce Boulevard Palm Coast, Florida 32164-3216 [tel]: (386) 986-4753 [fax]: (386) 986-3781 [email]: ccote@ci.palm-coast.fl.us ------------------------------------------------- | |||
| FD1 | COMPLETE | 06/12/2006 | 06/20/2006 |
| Note: Released By: JPATTEE This approval is for type 1, B,B building only Fire alarm system will require seperate permit. Automatic fire sprinkler system will require seperate permit. |
Fees & Payments
(Permit is not ready for pickup until the permit has been processed and fees appear)
| Description | Amount Due | Date Paid |
| ADMIN FEE | ¤20.00 | |
| BUILDING CODE ADMIN FUND | ¤55.38 | |
| ELECTRIC FEE | ¤558.00 | |
| FIRE PLANS REVIEW | ¤110.76 | |
| FIRE IMPACT FEE 4-1-06 | ¤1,434.96 | |
| MECHANICAL FEE | ¤558.00 | |
| PERMIT FEE | ¤4,840.00 | |
| PARKS IMPACT FEE 4/1/06 | ¤9,272.16 | |
| PLAN CHECK FEE | ¤1,012.00 | |
| PLUMBING FEE | ¤558.00 | |
| RADON FEE | ¤55.38 | |
| RENEW PERMIT FEES | ¤40.00 | |
| REVISION | ¤40.00 | |
| REVISION | ¤40.00 | |
| SCHOOL BOARD IMPACT FEE MULTI | ¤7,448.00 | |
| TRANS IMPACT FEE - CONDO/APT | ¤13,115.68 | |
| Fees | Total Due: ¤39,158.32 | Total Paid: ¤0.00 |